From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov 16 00:11:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA16524
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 16 Nov 1996 00:11:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA16519
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 1996 00:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id AAA16074; Sat, 16 Nov 1996 00:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611160811.AAA16074@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IRQ sharing on PCI? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:38:56 PST."
             <Pine.NEB.3.95.961115163716.2837T-100000@mail.cdsnet.net> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 00:10:59 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Do we support this?
>
>I noticed on 1 of my boxes when I rebooted it the following:
>
>tible display device> rev 76 int a irq 11 on pci0:8
>de0 <Digital DC21140 Fast Ethernet> rev 18 int a irq 11 on pci0:9
>de0: DC21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.2 Ethernet address 00:00:c0:4b:10:ed
>de0: enabling 10baseT UTP port
>ahc0 <Adaptec 2940 SCSI host adapter> rev 0 int a irq 11 on pci0:11
>
>
>Notice that they're all IRQ11, which I thought seemed odd.
>
>None of my other Pentiums do it, they all get different IRQ's.
>
>Anyway, any idea appreciated, I suppose it's entirely possible that it's
>just a reporting problem, as opposed to anything actually wrong.

   Yes, it is supported, and yes it's really happening.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project