Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:48:13 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r219699 - head/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=-0BFdeQUPOOc3tHxxOhPt17stq07CcyfZsDQq@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinOAWW%2B6a2WmhAjoqmj4V8aZkRHPJ%2BumVq=0onb@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201103161622.p2GGMxNp097642@svn.freebsd.org> <20110316174642.GB6367@freebsd.org> <AANLkTika25WRx=TWJXeNg_2786U11ff7_O68DkBz1oKc@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiny%2Bgzdtc078Wm_dHC9AsNG_xMGeLkz_5U8iu8g@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinOAWW%2B6a2WmhAjoqmj4V8aZkRHPJ%2BumVq=0onb@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 March 2011 21:37, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:

> For now, there's a report (which actually inspired me to retest and
> commit this) from someone who tried this on 2x 15k RPM SAS drives,
> with much better results using read_max=128 (thread "gmirror
> performance" on freebsd-fs@). I estimate that because his drives were
> 15kRPM from the start, the improvement isn't as drastic going from 8
> to 128 as on these SATA drives I tested on (faster seeks). He went
> from ~~ 195 MB/s to ~~ 258 MB/s while I go from ~~ 50 MB/s to ~~ 140
> MB/s.

Btw I also tested that random IO isn't affected by this: it isn't. The
read-ahead heuristics is working.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=-0BFdeQUPOOc3tHxxOhPt17stq07CcyfZsDQq>