Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 11:24:31 -0400 From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) To: "Karl Denninger, MCSNet" <karl@mcs.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN Compression Load on CPU Message-ID: <199605241524.LAA01034@etinc.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>But to try to claim that they *replace* the typical CISCO solution, or the >typical end-user attachment solution, is nuts. Two different targets, two >different markets. > >I can live with some quirky problem, or work to fix it myself, in a Unix >machine that is being used as a file or compute server. I absolutely >*CANNOT* live with that same problem in a core router on my network. I think the problem here is the work CISCO. Theres no advantage to 2500 series, mild advantage to 4000 and the 7XXX are in a class by themselves. noone here is talking about core routers, only you Karl. We'te talking about the other 98% of the world. Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605241524.LAA01034>