From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 06:44:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6605116A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 06:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC3543D49 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 06:44:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i4EDf90j040926 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Fri, 14 May 2004 17:41:09 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i4EDetbR040888; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Fri, 14 May 2004 17:40:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <40A4CCB1.8010700@cronyx.ru> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:42:09 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <40A3F1D5.5010209@bellsouth.net> <20040514155152.4d6dee6b@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <20040514155152.4d6dee6b@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: but withoutI WITNESS and INVARIANTS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:44:27 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >On Thu, 13 May 2004 17:08:21 -0500 >Nilson wrote: > > > >>I was wondering about the general status of the -CURRENT branch - is it >>horribly broken, or usable? >> >>I am wanting to bring my server back up to the latest -CURRENT (I last >>built a kernel and world about a month ago) >> >> > >How safe is it to run it without WITNESS and INVARIANTS ? > >My -CURRENT are pretty stable an I was wondering if they would do OK >without: INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT and WITNESS. > > The possibility that by disabling this debug stuff you will get some instability is very very .... very low :-) By turning them off you will get improved performance. By the way they are dissabled by default on every release. rik > > > >