From owner-freebsd-chat Fri May 23 16:14:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA23161 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 23 May 1997 16:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (joelh@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA23156 for ; Fri, 23 May 1997 16:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) id TAA20817; Fri, 23 May 1997 19:14:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 19:14:34 -0400 Message-Id: <199705232314.TAA20817@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: robmel@innotts.co.uk CC: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Robin Melville on Fri, 23 May 1997 21:18:38 +0100) Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>JFS for reliability, not for speed I hope... I've always found JFS slower >>than anything else. >Like everything Mac, I suppose. Surprising really considering the >speed of the chip. I suppose they have a Microsoft spy in place who >places timing loops in everything without telling anybody 8-) I thought that JFS was AIX, not MacOS. -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu All my opinions are my own, not the Free Software Foundation's. Second law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped