From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 22:26:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA66916A420 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (gndrsh.dnsmgr.net [205.238.40.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B910E43D46 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA78573; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:25:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200601252225.OAA78573@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <20060125224905.6594a2e8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> from Alexander Leidinger at "Jan 25, 2006 10:49:05 pm" To: Alexander@Leidinger.net (Alexander Leidinger) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:25:53 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware3 on FreeBSD 4.11 and 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:26:07 -0000 > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:32:08 -0800 (PST) > "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > > > > > > > Do you intend to participate a little bit again in FreeBSD-land? > > > > At least enough right now that I can get a network of 2.x to 4.9 > > machines all update to 5.4p8. > > 6.0 seems to work better (for an appropriate definition of "better") > for a lot of people. And 5.5/6.1 is around the corner (code freeze is > at the end of month for both branches). I been working on the migration to 5.x for almost a month, I wont these ``fixes'' in so that 5.5 might work for us out of the box for once. (Ok, never gona happen cause I still maintain a private version of gated 3.6-pub) > > If I start sending out diff -u's is this the place to send them to > > get them reviewed and commited? > > For ports which are maintained by emulation@: yes. > For linux ports which are maintained by ports@: you're not wrong here. Perhaps a PR would be a better idea? That way all can see it... -- Rod Grimes freebsd@freebsd.org