From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 14 13:36:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.interlog.com (smtp.interlog.com [207.34.202.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D06152DD for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 13:36:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paulg@interlog.com) Received: from shell1.interlog.com (paulg@shell1.interlog.com [207.34.202.8]) by smtp.interlog.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA13003; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 16:36:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 16:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: Paul Griffith To: FreeBSD-chat@FreeBSD.org Cc: solarisonintel@egroups.com Subject: PPro 200 vs PII 400 In-Reply-To: <19990313190305.A1423@austin.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am looking for any web sites that compares the PPro to the PII. I have a possible new customer that is looking to replace their PPro 200, with a PII 400 for about $6000.00 CDN. The problem is they have only 10 Win95 Clients running a DOS based business app. They have used up 1 GIG on a 2 GB HD in the last 2 years. Yet the new server includes 2x9.1 GB HD (L0 Raid). What gets me here is that the person who is trying to sell them this package didn't even suggest they upgrade their network to 100BaseT, it's still 10BaseT ! Any pointers. I was suggesting they upgrade their network first, then look at the Server. Thanks Paul Griffith <> paulg@interlog.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message