From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 00:29:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478511065707 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA448FC19 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so1078438ewy.13 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:29:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fkpWEaxl45Qba65yYosEFRee9QFpg6kXxuaOHJN14xY=; b=KWdrPSYClUfvWH8XV6n70qLIstkeF7fPWYylkQr1dX7k4P5SNP5tQt83Uqwux64dNu AWimOAfPfTExJ6gqosMP4Vzh8S4fWGltbuGRdYh7y2oraTSNluX4cCbff9MFFAUuvB+M 53hVRxnJbp5iM4cw8de1YGJ1SwT2soFLalLHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sVMHEkNgvNgTwC+Mc7686QjzO/uOI7a9NsaRHxENTIIqL4op+W+Ndk1Eplj6cL1gmi YUQXfegXotBG6rE+2hMgZKxN5ExwHraqoiNftts/dJAfKCgOWbSoeGAov9p9dCnMdUMo +cXk/qdvbNfztsd4uKB8/juK2BQ1JpnoOPYoE= Received: by 10.213.105.138 with SMTP id t10mr184068ebo.77.1278030540880; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm130210eeh.11.2010.07.01.17.28.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:28:43 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100702012843.31b987a5@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <945744.47563.qm@web52904.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <4C2D0AFA.9090502@gmail.com> <945744.47563.qm@web52904.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Convert all packages to ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:29:10 -0000 On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Chris Stankevitz wrote: > --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Glen Barber wrote: > However, your comment seems to be in disagreement with online > warnings of "do not mix 'pkg_add' packages with 'make' ports". > > My original question's intention was to prevent me from having a > system where some packages were installed with 'pkg_add' while others > were installed with 'make'. There's not a problem with mixing them per se - an installed package is the same whether it created from a port or a package file. Problems arise because the release packages where built against a snapshot of the ports tree made well before the release, so the dependencies can be very different from the current tree. Problems arise when people try to do piecemeal updates from ports, or try to use pkg_add after bringing the system up to date.