From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Tue Dec 13 11:55:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC26C753FA for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (fawn.irealone.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:4010:a07b:10::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B6219D6 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 35D6860DBB; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:55:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=acheronmedia.com; s=mail; t=1481630140; bh=VdvLqXo9yEMvSj/LTYvDMPEm1n8XVRrfxT++u3Xhr5w=; h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1+ZOCPNfRPuEZccjc09vEFrmxtiDxBZDoBK3BRmE8f9yebQ9WFqBbHz4ySCfGhahf m9Lb/47gl6ptaOcMo6ioG6lnJ5NDwPuYhJhzLKaF62jBFLFSFtmqAFP70KMFY+2SKD k++A1Ny63Otgvv4r8zkBUvqcUfaczxJHqKCl4x+I= To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/python3* ports, __pycache__ included X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:55:40 +0100 From: "Vlad K." Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9eb517ced907838f7c604427a01d659f@acheronmedia.com> X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 11:55:42 -0000 On 2016-12-13 12:36, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > My main point was that if disk utilisation is something one wants to > minimise (at deployment), that one would need to be able to turn the > optimization knob off each time (or system-wide) and that that would be > a handy thing to know and do. Personally, I'd love if Python could specify a base dir for bytecode cache, but it seems that's not gonna happen: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0304/ > Said another way, even if we (FreeBSD) de-packaged optimization files > which we want to do, that that *by itself* that would only save package > repository size and bandwidth, not deployment size. But in reality, what kind of gain/loss are we talking about here? I'm guessing it's pretty insignificant in this day and age, even for embedded? -- Vlad K.