From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 24 10:49:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BBC1065672; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D158FC18; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D321C46B49; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:49:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:49:18 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Alexander Best In-Reply-To: <20110424095736.GA92492@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201104240923.p3O9N8QG025386@svn.freebsd.org> <20110424095736.GA92492@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220983 - head X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:49:19 -0000 On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Alexander Best wrote: >> ============================================================================== >> --- head/UPDATING Sun Apr 24 08:58:58 2011 (r220982) >> +++ head/UPDATING Sun Apr 24 09:23:08 2011 (r220983) >> @@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 9. >> removed and replaced by respective CAM drivers. If you are using >> ATA device names in /etc/fstab or other places, make sure to update >> them respectively (adX -> adaY, acdX -> cdY, afdX -> daY, astX -> saY, >> - where 'Y's are the sequential numbers for each type in order of >> - detection, unless configured otherwise with tunables, see cam(4)). >> + where 'Y's are the sequential numbers starting from zero for each type >> + in order of detection, unless configured otherwise with tunables, >> + see cam(4)). > > maybe an extra sentence mentioning the fact that {geom,ufs}-labels and > ufsids are preferred over device nodes nowadays would be a good idea? If this is true, that's what our installer needs to do. Does our installer do that? (In general, a reasonable definition of "preferred" is "what the installer does" -- if that's not the case, it's a serious bug.) Robert