From owner-freebsd-lite2  Sat Aug 31 03:04:25 1996
Return-Path: owner-lite2
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA02711
          for lite2-outgoing; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 03:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA02705
          for <lite2@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 03:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1])
          by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA00764;
          Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:04:07 +0800 (WST)
Message-Id: <199608311004.SAA00764@spinner.DIALix.COM>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
cc: lite2@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BTW, the merge repository is "go.." 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:42:08 +0900."
             <Pine.SV4.3.93.960831182922.10638A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
Sender: owner-lite2@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk
  
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 18:04:07 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>

Michael Hancock wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> > Any questions? :-)
> 
> I have the cvs repository and plan to create the lite2 repository shortly,
> can we have 'base=/usr' in both cvsupfiles without having conflicts?

No.. You most definately cannot have the same base for src-cvs and 
src-lite2..  They have both got the same file structure...

Cheers,
-Peter