Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:49:12 +0100
From:      "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>
To:        "'steve@dobson.org'" <steve@dobson.org>
Cc:        "'ob-users@ooc.com'" <ob-users@ooc.com>, "'ejc@bazzle.com'" <ejc@bazzle.com>, "'freebsd-ports@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: ORBacus 4.0 for FreeBSD patches
Message-ID:  <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7950@l04.research.kpn.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Kess Jan, I think that modifing OB is the wrong way to get ORBacus to 
> work on FreeBSD.  As ORBacus already compiles with out JTC on FreeBSD
> (see /usr/ports/ORBacus) why are you doing this hack?  If you need the
> event service (as we do) then you must be doing some serious 
> re-design of that part of the code.  As soon as I can get JTC to pass
> all its test on FreeBSD then OB should compile without issue.  What are
> your thoughs.
>
My thoughts are that /usr/ports/ORBacus is OB 3, and by higher decree I am
to use OB 4. We're not even using the event service, and I doubt we're using
anything that needs JTC.

I just got it working for my stuff. Your patches are probably going to cover
more ground.

    Kees Jan

================================================
 You are only young once,
       but you can stay immature all your life.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7950>