From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jan 3 09:40:31 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA17397 for freebsd-arch-outgoing; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 09:40:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA17387 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 09:40:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA17167 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 18:40:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id SAA99083 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 18:40:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16129 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 09:30:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA17065 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 18:29:50 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id SAA99030 for arch@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 18:29:49 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19990103182949.T88411@follo.net> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 18:29:49 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Administrativa Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My policy on approval: I'll approve (in the sense that I will try to bring it to the list after suitable editing) anything I deem bring extra information to a topic, as long as it is not in violation of policy for the thread. To have a formal policy for a thread, the thread initiator must state the policy clearly in the initial message in the thread. A note on wasting time: Please try to keep the discussions that are Cc:'ed freebsd-arch based on the messages that actually are approved to freebsd-arch. That is, replying to a Cc: you got (instead of messages sent to the actual list) is a Bad Idea. I've had to drop a couple of entire subthreads run between people on the To/Cc list; this isn't a large hassle for me, but it waste the time of the people writing. (I've thought of setting Reply-To for the list, but that isn't a good solution, so I'll start off with just an appeal for sense.) On submissions: All submissions are either approved, or I send a message to the author explaining why it wasn't approved. If you don't get either, get in touch - messages are not supposed to be silently dropped. On editing: I will fix minor spelling problems, normalize formatting/quotations, cut excessive quotation, and possibly fix up minor, obvious grammatical problems (misplaced commas and similar). Anything requiring more editing than that will be returned to the author for re-submission. I will not do anything that I consider to change the overall tone of the message. If you have issues with how I moderate the list or what I do to your post, please contact me so we can try to work out how to fix it. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message