From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 22 20:47:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7758416A4CE; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 485B043D1D; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu)
Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0MKmDob011863;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:48:13 -0800
Received: (from brdavis@localhost)
	by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j0MKmDOG011862;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:48:13 -0800
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:48:13 -0800
From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20050122204813.GD4466@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
References: <20050122152035.32578.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050122152035.32578.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: bremner@unb.ca
cc: jan.lentfer@web.de
cc: portmgr@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: repocopy lam7 --> lam
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:52 -0000


--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 07:20:35AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hi;
>=20
> According to lam's website:
>=20
> "LAM 6.5.9 is not recommended because the LAM source code has seen a lot =
of
> changes, bug fixes and new features since then. It is still available for
> download only because some vendors still require it."
>=20
> They also recommend lam 7.1.1 for all lam/mpi users.
>=20
> I've been suggesting to the LAM maintainers that we should repocopy lam to
> lam6, and make lam7 the new lam from now on. I'm not the maintainer of ei=
ther
> so I probably shouldn't be sending the PR. Just wondering if there are
> objections to this.

I don't think this is likely to be worth the churn.  It seems likely
that LAM will be superseded by OpenMPI soon and will fade away.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB8rwMXY6L6fI4GtQRArVnAJ45r+21tYWOu+ZcqXWS09wLQD8XigCgsLMo
vsX7Boh6AGCc6VUOOceSyMA=
=8UD5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf--