From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 14:03:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B948B16A402 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 14:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4163613C480 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 14:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (zohwns@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l4EE3DG6058692; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:03:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l4EE3Dq0058691; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:03:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:03:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200705141403.l4EE3Dq0058691@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd@hub.org In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 14 May 2007 16:03:18 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: UNIX domain sockets MFC's X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd@hub.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:03:20 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I'm curious about something ... way back, when I was using unionfs, I had a > major problem with vnode leakage ... as I mentioned before, this server is the > only one I have that uses geom/gmirror on its drives, the rest all use hardware > RAID ... is there *any* possibility that I'm seeing some sort of interaction > issue? It really bothers me that the only server that I'm seeing this one is > the one that I'm using software RAID on ... FWIW, I have two servers running RELENG_6 (2 months old) using gmirror and with a few jails (not many, though ... they're used for Apache web servers and PostgreSQL). I'm not seeing any socket leakage. $ sysctl kern.ipc | grep sockets kern.ipc.numopensockets: 118 kern.ipc.maxsockets: 12328 $ uptime 3:55PM up 82 days, 20:39, 3 users, load averages: 0.04, 0.05, 0.02 $ gmirror status Name Status Components mirror/gm0 COMPLETE ad0 ad1 If you have more hints how to reproduce the problem, I might give it a try if it's not too much trouble. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "File names are infinite in length, where infinity is set to 255 characters." -- Peter Collinson, "The Unix File System"