From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Dec 16 08:54:45 1996
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA16989
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 08:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from solozzo.tele.pw.edu.pl (solozzo.tele.pw.edu.pl [148.81.65.130])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA16978
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 08:54:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612161654.IAA16978@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by solozzo.tele.pw.edu.pl
	(1.40.112.4/16.2) id AA009865548; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 17:59:09 +0100
From: Adam Kubicki <mikee@solozzo.tele.pw.edu.pl>
Subject: why is -stable not secure?
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 17:59:06 MET
X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 112.2]
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

hi,

I'd like to ask why patches included in -current aren't in -stable
version? There are few serious bugs (security too) fixed in -current but not
in -stable. How long it takes to move patches to -stable source tree??

-adam