From owner-freebsd-net Sun Oct 29 11:19:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C16837B479 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:19:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hamlet.nectar.com (hamlet.nectar.com [10.0.1.102]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F965193DF; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:19:16 -0600 (CST) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by hamlet.nectar.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id e9TJJG569784; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:19:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:19:16 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B" Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getaddrinfo and the UNIX domain Message-ID: <20001029131915.A69752@hamlet.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B" , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001028163909.A77420@hamlet.nectar.com> <20001029100529.B26020@spawn.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:11:26AM +0900 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 01:11:26AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote: > I admit you could say that (thus I added "in my understanding" in my > previous message). Anyway, the problem is that there's no standard > about combination of PF_UNIX and getaddrinfo(), as itojun pointed out. Yes, just to be clear, I think we're in agreement here :-) -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message