From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 01:38:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA0F37B401; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:38:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AEC43FA3; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:38:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (66-91-236-204.san.rr.com [66.91.236.204]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D676542D23; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:38:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr To: "Andrew R. Reiter" , Jeff Roberson Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 01:38:36 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030410162943.T37530-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20030410164003.G39679@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20030410164003.G39679@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304110138.36151.wes@softweyr.com> cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Julian Elischer cc: John Baldwin cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Julian Elischer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:38:43 -0000 On Thursday 10 April 2003 13:42, Andrew R. Reiter wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > : > :Yes, I'm telling you, if you add anything make it specific to the > :scheduler. It doesn't not need to be in scheduler independant code. > : We just need a new system call for binding a kse to a cpu. This will > : be scheduler independant and then we can call a scheduler dependant > : routine like sched_bind(kse, cpu); > > How could one retrieve the current affinity of a kse? I sorta like the > linux method of set and get affinity and using a bit mask for the CPUs > a process can be bound to. Does this scale well when the number of processors grows large? I'm just looking forward to FreeBSD on Starfire and Sunfire systems... ;^) -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com