From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 13:16:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF24116A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:16:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ox.eicat.ca (ox.eicat.ca [66.96.30.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EFD43D45 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:16:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by ox.eicat.ca (Postfix, from userid 66) id DDDDAD346; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:16:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 6A6AE6368; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:16:06 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16866.32790.398095.651691@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:16:06 -0500 To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 16) "Corporate Culture" XEmacs Lucid Subject: processor type. X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:16:13 -0000 I see in the compiler lines crawling by that gcc is asked to optimize for 'EV5' while being compatible with 'EV4'. My Alpha is an EV4 --- I'm wondering if I would see better performance with a different flag there, but the gcc manual doesn't even acknowledge the existance of the options that are in use, let alone the available options. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================