From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 12 17:59:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7531065673 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shild@sbcglobal.net) Received: from flpi101.prodigy.net (flpi101.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00DB8FC14 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shild@sbcglobal.net) X-ORBL: [68.75.165.252] Received: from fbsd1.dyndns.org (adsl-68-75-165-252.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net [68.75.165.252]) by flpi101.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3CHnFZQ020003 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:49:15 -0700 Received: from fbsd1.dyndns.org (localhost.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by fbsd1.dyndns.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3CHmXQH083931 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:48:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from shild@sbcglobal.net) Received: (from shildret@localhost) by fbsd1.dyndns.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m3CHmW74083930 for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:48:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from shild@sbcglobal.net) X-Authentication-Warning: fbsd1.dyndns.org: shildret set sender to shild@sbcglobal.net using -f From: "Scott T. Hildreth" To: FreeBSD-OpenOffice Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:48:30 -0500 Message-Id: <1208022510.26067.17.camel@fbsd1.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Is the patch-gtkfix still needed with 2.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shild@sbcglobal.net List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:59:18 -0000 I am still running 2.3 and am considering the upgrade to 2.4. I think a lot of the patches that have been reported on the list have been committed (I think). I don't think the patch-gtkfix was committed or was even going to be committed or still needed with 2.4. Thanks, STH