From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun May 18 20:31:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA29788
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 18 May 1997 20:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA29782
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 18 May 1997 20:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA10372;
	Sun, 18 May 1997 22:30:02 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199705190330.WAA10372@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: GNAT-pthreads integration bugs/questions
In-Reply-To: <199705190257.WAA16061@darkwing.rutgers.edu> from "David S. Miller" at "May 18, 97 10:57:25 pm"
To: davem@caip.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller)
Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 22:30:02 -0500 (EST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au
Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>    From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
>    Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 19:41:17 -0700 (MST)
> 
>    > Put it at the bottom on the threads stack...
> 
>    There is no threads stack in an rfork.
> 
> A thread lacks a stack with rfork(), is this what you are
> saying?  How in the world does this work?
> 
Why does rfork need to be concerned with a stack?  It can
be handled in userland.

John