From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 14 22:25:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1E537B401; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:25:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA9543F93; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:25:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2F6OIrI052450; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 01:24:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: Fail to build XEmacs with GTK From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Doug Barton Cc: Kris Kennaway , Peter Wu , ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030314210940.N1839@znfgre.tberna.bet> References: <1047615404.66262.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030314043154.GA94526@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1047616453.66262.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030313230858.H1839@znfgre.tberna.bet> <1047645619.2553.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030314210940.N1839@znfgre.tberna.bet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1047709502.75367.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 15 Mar 2003 01:25:02 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-33.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 00:11, Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 02:09, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > However, WITH/WANT_GTK are deprecated, > > > > > > I never saw a good explanation for this. If I just want gtk, why do I= have > > > to get *_GNOME involved? > > > > It allowed us to scale more, and remove redundancy. For example, you > > can have WITH_GTK (that's fine). But what about GTK2, GTK3, etc.? Wit= h > > one macro that allows for listing, we can better accommodate things lik= e > > this. After 4.8 is released, the USE_GNOMENG macro will go away, so > > you'll be down to just USE_GNOME=3D . >=20 > Sorry, you haven't actually answered my question. Why were the gtk knobs > sucked into gnome? gnome is one consumer of gtk, but there are many > others. Don't know for sure. This happened before my time. >=20 > > (And, for backwards compatibility's sake, WITH_GTK will still be around > > for a while). >=20 > IMO, it should stay around in perpetuity. For the reasons I listed above, I don't think this is a good idea. Why is it such a problem to substitute WITH_GTK with USE_GNOME=3Dgtk12? After all, this is documented. Joe >=20 > Doug --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+csc+b2iPiv4Uz4cRAkuUAKChZUhqEd3CxnLVEpWQfnQKVGdr4wCcD00O CgcOP/nkPx5vbLmO1KeXDuw= =jrVR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xbFe/72pWqBF/hTNoOGR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message