From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 26 22:10:09 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA17176
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 22:10:09 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA17168
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 22:10:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA00458; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 22:09:25 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: time.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ncurses 1.9.0 released 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Apr 1995 04:25:20 +0400."
             <199504270025.AA10980@newcom.kiae.su> 
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 22:09:24 -0700
Message-ID: <456.798959364@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

So, when do we simply transition over ourselvse? :-)

I've been thinking for awhile that having two curses libraries is
somewhat bogus.  Given that ncurses now has a `fallback mode' for
/etc/termcap, I don't see that we have much left to wait for.  As soon
as 1.9.0 makes it into the tree, I'll try some experiements with
replacing curses entirely with it and see how it works.

						Jordan