Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:00:59 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -r vs. ports/UPDATING Message-ID: <4E560F4B.40609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E560E9B.3050508@gmx.de> References: <201108240538.50514.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110824145157.4b392216@172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net> <4E560E9B.3050508@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/25/2011 01:58, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 24.08.2011 23:51, schrieb Doug Barton: >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:38:50 -0500 >> ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 >>> >>> I did: >>> >>> portmaster -r libnotify-0.\* >>> libproxy-0.\* portmaster -a >> >> It's not clear to me exactly what you were trying to accomplish there, >> but a few notes .... >> >> The -r option can only be run for one port at a time. > > Doug, > > the user probably stuck to a ports/UPDATING entry, 20110823, written by > gnome@ (cc'd). Yes, that's apparent, and quite unfortunate. > (Do we need to audit ports/UPDATING altogether for such misdirections?) I just fixed the libnotify entry, and searched down some of the more recent entries and didn't see any other similar problems. > Perhaps this behaviour could change in a future version of portmaster, Patches are always welcome. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E560F4B.40609>