From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Apr 23 00:05:30 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D525FAAB31 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbaio@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qk0-f195.google.com (mail-qk0-f195.google.com [209.85.220.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD28579C86 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbaio@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-qk0-f195.google.com with SMTP id d74so14473145qkg.4 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:05:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9hlOUcDQsh4OgmR7TPyUaqsOHCnVVYnBsQCnH4t7zYI=; b=YmGZqSItM6/fazTyhkk83aYByE+krtY8h1mLn3GTcW4NG2/4qW4jv+W4oLRASluoAi Amq5EmZp08TDPOGxST/zvCj8sgvmvXzzYvKNiLQgSb5eTXeD48PhlZNVKjo++XYLzmfE rQBKAaXOrCyWRX3Odpnu2txSlG1cjwx7a9207IaSJPu5tsTc6OUMlcab9n0h3ftslYxR xWQvDViBGkmWJwySuqP7HDfeSRTBpFxde+/ZqtOC5CClsFRohCvhZ93QzqDIVViJSlfS ZGEXvnNMDvX14rMkxCqoby4erP6nfmidDzNMD5WhwygjHz1/7Jc5ZcRoH2cJbp2E2SAv 7t4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDs2Ox8I62Pnj9aoxUJ4WeI92pOQ4g0XPXo51kJCmbh9vByjvmJ ifbFnhNxOT9hP8URJ7cQ6Up4cg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49Se8LyC5tDtwQEq1gi6NmcklzEdpk2cZgDnSFTcXDppCjd1dimSMMG+y7jKvSddt/MklutMw== X-Received: by 10.55.101.87 with SMTP id z84mr21235442qkb.178.1524441591398; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 16:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dx240.localdomain ([177.156.120.126]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e126sm8709296qkd.45.2018.04.22.16.59.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 16:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 20:59:27 -0300 From: "Danilo G. Baio" To: Cy Schubert Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, remko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r468060 - in head/mail: . dovecot dovecot-pigeonhole dovecot-pigeonhole04 dovecot22 Message-ID: <20180422235927.oonegpotv6kfx2gi@dx240.localdomain> References: <201804222135.w3MLZcg0018324@repo.freebsd.org> <201804222241.w3MMfD1T020924@slippy.cwsent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uf7j7oxn3xg7d7mj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201804222241.w3MMfD1T020924@slippy.cwsent.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:05:30 -0000 --uf7j7oxn3xg7d7mj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 03:41:13PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <201804222135.w3MLZcg0018324@repo.freebsd.org>, "Danilo G.=20 > Baio" wri > tes: > > Author: dbaio > > Date: Sun Apr 22 21:35:38 2018 > > New Revision: 468060 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/468060 > > > > Log: > > Add mail/dovecot22 (v2.2.35) and mail/dovecot-pigeonhole04 (v0.4.23) > > =20 > > This brings back Dovecot 2.2.35 to the tree because there is an issue > > with version 2.3.1 and replication in some scenarios [1]. > > =20 > > Keep this version until this problem gets fixed upstream. > > =20 > > 1 - https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2018-April/111477.html >=20 > Reading through the thread it appears that .2.2.35 also has a=20 > replication issue. See https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2018-April/1 > 11496.html. Should we revert back to 2.2.33.2? I don't know yet, maybe if other people report similar problem. I had the same issue described by Remko in the thread and I'm currently run= ning fine with 2.2.35. I think he is is running 2.2.35 as well. If tomorrow shows other errors when more people using the service I'll let = you know. Regards. --=20 Danilo G. Baio (dbaio) --uf7j7oxn3xg7d7mj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEORj0UTsjzCy+enIkmpN7LfMuiNcFAlrdIdsACgkQmpN7LfMu iNevZQ/+PrQ/hPCeAhIMZ23mGjgRGWnTAkw8W4JXmKsUxPJmJwtjBxT7iD+k3UST KwoM9lUzPMoWz2M7Wh34tDDDaRd/DkOCijUX4Bpp5gH+avb18s/2Vv2vzOut4rcT CaVCjyJmSAm0s+DtJaR2crFc5nDvxEjo7+ky9R1peB/imOmJD7zb4E3+xXwsOjJE fXebjDpmktdx6VJrvvbUKzisLjBE+VfzgY58WCgNjq8mIqiEDEdiNs/ajvJ0F/L4 d2bLtcfKdfiFue5/QbjstwK/K2Mr2bIWMilDDUgq3VhDCSYWcdBqWgRV/+cyvyc7 6XE8YhEXu93TZXQ/P9p1jXRl8PO34vvmC4DG3wEqZhx5oS0ylfrrxY7F7+XLjmEr LCKzaXMQmpOKmNTpTgtqOpxS9n7hR7RlZTSTIdrC3CgT5GMs3QXsl3CGx3axQZMu 7mERMzn8D8+6T/n5ErSC2aHL+qbRzcAK8f0nquGUwi3mGtgzcqJD7zUh1dN2CDPH NjrexltS3Jp9VvovyaqxrZTDNH7pWixdq9TspOz2tuMLng9ElejKrKcY7A5MGzfK oL9kXkfZGQz1uA8Z/zuPdrsiwPnnU7vhan4N/zdUB9Hen4XP342aKMr4fbOe3xde 66oXS3V6beOV8QyuzFRdJqgnZ0z1TyFUng4EO8GFdsGAihEoECs= =8ant -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uf7j7oxn3xg7d7mj--