From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Nov 18 13:34:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA13354
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:34:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from red.jnx.com (red.jnx.com [208.197.169.254])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA13345
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chimp.jnx.com (chimp.jnx.com [208.197.169.246]) by red.jnx.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id NAA16289; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA14036; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 13:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611182133.NAA14036@chimp.jnx.com>
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: dennis@etinc.com
CC: isp@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199611182051.PAA00784@etinc.com> (dennis@etinc.com)
Subject: Re: changed to: Frac T3?
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


   But you are misslng the point that Freebsd is a general OS and the 
   methods used by dedicated routers are not appropriate for general
   OSs...using freebsd as a base for a specialized router OS and changing
   the way BSD routes are very different issues.

Let's just agree to disagree.

Tony