Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:40:22 -0400 From: Nicolas Blais <nb_root@videotron.ca> To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why there is a newer OOo port than the binary? Message-ID: <200609181740.30871.nb_root@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <h4g3u3-tp1.ln1@news.t-online.com> References: <p2b0u3-ui41.ln1@news.t-online.com> <200609181516.05432.nb_root@videotron.ca> <h4g3u3-tp1.ln1@news.t-online.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5093935.ekMIML7EMH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > I don't like compiling OO either :) > > But you do ;-) > > > Have you tried the -x option ? You can portupgrade everything but exclu= de > > openoffice like so: > > > > portupgrade -avx openoffice > > Oh, cool. > > My port is named "de-openoffice..." so thats the name for the -x > option? > > Heino Yep, if it doesn't work for some reason, you can always use the full name. Nicolas. =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Sep 17 10:21:02 EDT 2006 =20 nicblais@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart5093935.ekMIML7EMH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFDxJO4wTBlvcsbJURArmnAJ9XLihnQmtN6ixVh6O8NSwINvQ9VgCgnXHo rasovpfzGSiLjENoPvql+IA= =2VTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5093935.ekMIML7EMH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609181740.30871.nb_root>