From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 11:16:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17FC16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:16:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from mail.yazzy.net (mail.yazzy.net [217.8.140.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0997B43D45 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from lapdance.yazzy.net (unknown [192.168.99.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yazzy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A24D39835; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:17:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:15:35 +0000 From: Marcin Jessa To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20060204111535.31e42861.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <20060203225114.GA9845@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <17379.56708.421007.613310@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20060203225114.GA9845@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: YazzY.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, gallatin@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: machdep.cpu_idle_hlt and SMP perf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:16:40 -0000 On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:51:14 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:47:32PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Why dooes machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1 drop my 10GbE network rx > > performance by a considerable amount (7.5Gbs -> 5.5Gbs)? > > I don't know, but I've set this to 0 on my machines because I also > noticed a significant performance drop on general workloads with it > set to 1. On a 32 or 64-bits CPU?