Date: 29 Sep 2000 12:28:00 +0200 From: Rasmus Kaj <kaj@raditex.se> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: Rasmus Kaj <kaj@raditex.se> Subject: Re: RFC: Ports layout reorganization (Re: ports tree idea: Combine DESCR and COMMENT) Message-ID: <84pulntrv3.fsf@frodo.sickla.raditex.se> In-Reply-To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG's message of "29 Sep 2000 02:03:37 -0700" References: <39CD200B.A10214EA@glue.umd.edu> <20000923233215.A45139@mithrandr.moria.org> <39CD295E.453FF278@glue.umd.edu> <vqcsnqjin86.fsf_-_@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "PW" == Satoshi <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: PW> As for reducing the number of directories, this is what I came up PW> with. Comments welcome. [ ... ] Sounds wonderfull! PW> One issue I'm still wondering is the name of the "checksum" file. We PW> can put things like size information in there too, so "checksum" is PW> can still be a misnomer. [ ... ] If we put the checksum (size / date / whatever) in variables in the Makefile we get away from that problem. But maybe that creates other, worse, problems? I't has been suggested before, so it's probably got turned down for a good reason. -- Rasmus Kaj ------------------------ rasmus@kaj.se - http://Raditex.se/~kaj/ \ Replies should be brief and interesting. \----------------------------------------------------- http://Raditex.se/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84pulntrv3.fsf>