From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 11:32:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE50106564A for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff@jeffawaddell.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9C08FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff@jeffawaddell.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so394992rvb.1 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.18.1 with SMTP id v1mr6872550wai.81.1214996783460; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.22.15 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:06:23 -0700 From: "Jeff Waddell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: ZFS xattr attribute "temporary" off status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:32:52 -0000 I've recently begun playing around with zfs on a freebsd7 build, as well as a recent nightly build of FreeNAS (based on freebsd7) and have noticed something peculiar that I haven't experienced with ZFS on either Solaris or Mac OS X. For some reason, freebsd (on both systems) is setting the zfs xattr (extended attributes) attribute "temporarily" off. Setting xattr=on appears to work, but actually does nothing. The xattr attribute is also the only ZFS attribute with a temporary setting, and no matter what I try, I can't set it on. Why is this happening on freebsd, and is it fixable or an issue with freebsd's zfs implementation (such as xattrs not being implemented yet)? Thanks for your assistance! -- -Jeff