From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 7 19:54:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BE616A4DD; Sat, 7 May 2005 19:54:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 62-15-215-178.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-215-178.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.215.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4306243D88; Sat, 7 May 2005 19:54:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from orion.redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) j47Jrufk010318; Sat, 7 May 2005 21:53:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by orion.redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j47JrtWP087293; Sat, 7 May 2005 21:53:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) X-Authentication-Warning: orion.redesjm.local: josemi set sender to josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es using -f From: Jose M Rodriguez Organization: Redes JM To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 21:53:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050502201921.4F0387306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050507192448.GA1401@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20050507192448.GA1401@gothmog.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505072153.54369.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.30.0.12; VDF: 6.30.0.161; host: antares.redesjm.local) cc: Darren Reed cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: IPFILTER Branch [was: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 19:54:03 -0000 El S=E1bado, 7 de Mayo de 2005 21:24, Giorgos Keramidas escribi=F3: > On 2005-05-07 10:30, Peter Schultz wrote: > > Darren is on holiday, so you will not be getting a veto anytime > > soon. > > Not really. That was a joke (but I fell for it too)! > > > As an aside, Darren is so notorious for breaking the build, I don't > > know why anyone bothers complaining anymore. I'm beginning to > > think he does it just to get under people's skin. Either take away > > his privileges or accept that he will be breaking the build. > > Darren maintains IP Filter on a lot of platforms *AND* has a real > dayjob to work for. You're right about him having broken the build a > few times, but that's not the end of the world. He is making an > effort to fix what gets broken, after all. > > Let's not overreact, shall we? :-) > > As far as a branch is concerned, please *NO*! Anyone who wishes to > maintain a separate IP Filter spinoff of CURRENT can do it using his > own disk space and CVS repository (or Perforce branch, if you > prefer). > > - Giorgos > But I think that this kind of pull-ups really needs of some HEAD-UPs and=20 the assistance of people more closer to current, before the breakage. At last, I can't see this kind of matters in NetBSD, where the pullups=20 are done by 'NetBSD people'. And this with all the respect to Darren's ipf work, that I use both in=20 =46reeBSD and NetBSD. =2D- josemi