From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 27 00:45:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2DC6EB for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (mail-pb0-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12DAD28F0 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md12so2587486pbc.2 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=fgE+CCBgRjF+lSalQkmZOscuMM5fYpQxppHoTRVxw6M=; b=Wv18NWoe+Wcz0vGS2X8YrXQglXgz5mHvaJR30NziQYy7ufqhU/v7u58aAqh39MO5/q QzSIpU6vztmfTuNBxz7EUXjw+zSGxqAUjHazyeO0I5/6VCK/y3SXX5dv6S+YdA8ayPZR 8sHy3lPEZThqv7wy+ah+18Mb2XQ0Kc37fBkqB2YOpG0BUuLa99Ci7gmV9LxM76uZbiVQ 6lbRXEbN6EZ+vYiVwTamJ2Uj0+5dTNIupIQTZaxFp3g35CETKY9FvSVaMtKs1aPDBT5J tbUd+IBNlwskUeF1k2pZXHnBOHnTIeHTpC7Vct0GeMdTQ4lU0gWqtAgCWq1RAGy9pF0D giAw== X-Received: by 10.66.160.3 with SMTP id xg3mr27565695pab.28.1374885901219; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.45.125.101] ([156.39.10.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ht5sm62617206pbb.29.2013.07.26.17.44.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Warner Losh Subject: Re: amd64: -O2 even with DEBUG Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20130726185425.GS26412@funkthat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:44:58 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <51F221D4.8040308@FreeBSD.org> <20130726185425.GS26412@funkthat.com> To: John-Mark Gurney X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQko61/0VC2ITEOcUlGVG+v/2+1naj7w3J1oosvIytrg8FOgeYwuxP8E0RmwXpYvXOckGbGY Cc: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:45:02 -0000 On Jul 26, 2013, at 11:54 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Andriy Gapon wrote this message on Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:14 +0300: >> I wonder why amd64 is distinguished to have -O2 in COPTFLAGS even = when DEBUG is >> defined. For all other archs it's -O for that case. >>=20 >> Perhaps, this was discussed / explained in the past, but I would = appreciate it >> being said again (or even written as a comment in kern.pre.mk). >=20 > It's probably because at least gcc produces terrible amd64 code w/o > it... It will constantly reload the register it uses to do relative > loads w/ the same value even though nothing changed... makes = performance > suck...=20 Still looks like it is implemented wrongly though... Warner