From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 30 21:47:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4272016A4CE; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:47:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (www1.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5230A43D46; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:47:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7]) (MDaemon.PRO.v8.0.1.R) with ESMTP id md50001371910.msg; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:43:06 +0100 Message-ID: <005301c54dce$14ee2400$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Kris Kennaway" References: <4273D21D.2189.352DF748@d.wagner.absamail.co.za><008201c54da5$16630d60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk><009101c54da9$375f9570$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20050430213556.GA51804@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:46:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:43:06 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:43:08 +0100 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: d.wagner@absamail.co.za cc: cy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: screen-4.0.2_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:47:03 -0000 On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >> So I assume that's why it was removed but tbh I haven't had this happen >> since >> 5.1 days and removing the package is therefore a pain and should be put >> back IMO. >From: "Kris Kennaway" > > The bug still exists as far as anyone knows. The reason you haven't >seen it happen is because you're no longer using the package. All our installs are done via pxe using a custom install.cfg which just has a sudo package with dependencies to all the base packages we require including screen and not as single machine has had an issue since 5.1 but maybe thats just me. Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.