From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 3 17:08:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28514 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 17:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.anasazi.com (mailhost.anasazi.com [138.113.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA28450; Sun, 3 Aug 1997 17:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chad.anasazi.com by mailhost.anasazi.com (5.65/3.7b) id AA19600; Sun, 3 Aug 97 17:06:38 -0700 Received: by chad.anasazi.com (5.65/3.7) id AA19980; Sun, 3 Aug 97 17:06:35 -0700 From: chad@anasazi.com (Chad R. Larson) Message-Id: <9708040006.AA19980@chad.anasazi.com> Subject: Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued To: phk@dk.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 17:06:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: ade@demon.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <2297.870554943@critter.dk.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Aug 2, 97 10:49:03 pm Reply-To: chad@anasazi.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >Possibly, a somewhat simplistic attitude, but certainly something > >to consider, no? > >-- > >Ade Lovett, Demon Internet Ltd. > > And it has been considered, and as far as I know fell because what > nobody saw any chance of "minimal system" being definable so that > any significant majority would agree to it. Perhaps starting with the POSIX 1003.? documents, or X/Open "Single UNIX" would do. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-870-3330 chad@anasazi.com chad@anasaz.UUCP chad@dcfinc.com Anasazi, Inc. - 7500 North Dreamy Draw Drive, Suite 120, Phoenix, Az 85020