From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 09:02:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DE0924; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A6E8FC15; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBD92GoQ009087; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:02:16 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBD92F3N009086; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:02:15 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:02:15 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: svn commit: r244112 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <20121213090215.GP97487@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212110708.qBB78EWx025288@svn.freebsd.org> <201212121046.43706.jhb@freebsd.org> <201212121658.49048.jhb@freebsd.org> <50C90567.8080406@FreeBSD.org> <50C909BD.9090709@mu.org> <50C91B32.4080904@FreeBSD.org> <50C91CD3.7030900@mu.org> <50C9206D.6080502@FreeBSD.org> <50C9271C.70803@mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50C9271C.70803@mu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Adrian Chadd , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein , Andriy Gapon , Navdeep Parhar , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:02:22 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:53:48PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: A> The problem again is that not all the KASSERTS are inviolable, if you A> want to do a project to split them, then please do, it would really be A> helpful, as for now, they are a mis-mash of death/warnings and there are A> at least three vendors who approve of this as well as 3 long term A> committers that approved my change (not including Adrian). Can you show examples of not inviolable KASSERTs? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.