Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:10:16 +0200 From: Johann Visagie <johann@egenetics.com> To: Tony Maher <tonym@biolateral.com.au> Cc: admin@govital.net, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-20020103 Message-ID: <20020109101016.GD2775@fling.sanbi.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <200201080906.g08968p80613@yellow.biolateral.com.au> References: <3C3A9C41.C16CF8BA@govital.net> <200201080906.g08968p80613@yellow.biolateral.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Maher on 2002-01-08 (Tue) at 20:06:08 +1100:
>
> > while, ever since I started using the portupgrade program. It would be
> > nice if the ports sub system would remember what command line options
> > were used when a port has been built. Or maybe having the option of
>
> For portupgrade it already exists:
>
[ snip ]
>
> But it would be nice if the ports system handled it intrinsically.
What about the idea of a standard target for ports ("help"?) that simply
lists all the options which may be used when building that port?
-- V
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020109101016.GD2775>