From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 17:18:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6844116A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75C513C468 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1181203fgg.35 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=7L1qCG6iDj9Z+T6kdx3ZeB2CRNrz0pecpyIZp6P/1vY=; b=F0vJAG9HQSjWxm5z7x/P1vLESMWfP8+ypbZkoj/faMuJFzDZeCK4QSuawyhweNjvGp8SGMaEKDsJ488locAATxgz4O/Dzorwc5QPOzgpOEBtbQIUtNspMBbAMcBPwW7xYcMB6uXsLVsPc9u/QWvzSaT6Ssa/wlbSBn1nCeWhElg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GLgPCcEWcbNHwCmIW4RlK2HSb0VDhgixFyPYNqDxPQaKxCOVkjOkDZ15Cg9xI4JZzjtmptt+AXOYW0mH5Pb2UaUZ/x4c9YDNh1rztrg0z5hvDsd/Cj+RGrM3f07pX3Bwp4TV6WxbKN02jdDf58Lyhg76tn+rUfa5WPsVkdLg/4M= Received: by 10.86.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr3180711fge.35.1201367927148; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.53.7 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:18:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10801260918k56c1a73hf28ff154eca0b74c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:18:47 +0100 From: "Attilio Rao" Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com To: "Doug Barton" In-Reply-To: <479B6303.6000401@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <790a9fff0801150552l542a4238ofc12efe5fdb45fc2@mail.gmail.com> <20080115143924.GB57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080124122808.GA15600@freefall.freebsd.org> <3bbf2fe10801240518i6e18b2f5w84de652d4170c95b@mail.gmail.com> <20080124145811.GB78114@comp.chem.msu.su> <3bbf2fe10801240707o72b927cg74dbf9b7bbcd88fc@mail.gmail.com> <20080125075551.GB21633@comp.chem.msu.su> <3bbf2fe10801250000k5852c2f2j5d1897c900096818@mail.gmail.com> <20080126142901.GD49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <479B6303.6000401@FreeBSD.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 00575f0af70a79b5 Cc: Kostik Belousov , Yar Tikhiy , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:18:50 -0000 2008/1/26, Doug Barton : > Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower > > than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately. Broken UFS > > would be a nightmare. > > IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually > function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can > panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access > to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at > least for my personal usage pattern. I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my patches or not? Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein