From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 17 07:45:44 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA05383 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 17 May 1995 07:45:44 -0700 Received: from mail.bw.lgca.ohio.gov (mail.bw.lgca.ohio.gov [156.63.242.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA05376 for ; Wed, 17 May 1995 07:45:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (ram@localhost) by mail.bw.lgca.ohio.gov (8.3/8.3) id MAA01078; Wed, 17 May 1995 12:44:31 -0400 From: Ronald Matuszak Message-Id: <199505171644.MAA01078@mail.bw.lgca.ohio.gov> Subject: Pine port???? To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 12:44:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1149 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have recently upgraded from our old 486 running FreeBSD 1.0 to our new 90 mhz pentium running FreeBSD 2.0 :-) I am <> to install Pine3.91. I could not get it to compile on our old 486 with 1.0 . So I waited until The new system was up and running. I ran the makefile from the FreeBSD 2.0 cd and it ftp'd the tar.z file and then after I copied the pine directory from "ports" onto my hard drive it began to compile. Pico works great but Pine did not compile at all. I read something from cdrom.com that said that users of FreeBSD 2.0R or earlyer had to have some sort of new tree installed in order to make the ports work. Is this correct. I am a unix newbie amd have some other newbies helping me and I wouldmlike to know if I am missing anything to install Pine3.91 I know it is a pretty vague question... I am willing to spend all the time needed to make it work. Can you please let nme know if the stuff on thye cd is valid or do I need to compile it some other way. Thanks for all your help... I only need to get Pine to work so my boss (a mac only guy) will get off my back because he says elm is to hard to use :-(