From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Dec 24 09:33:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4037133C351 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486D6771C8; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p2E52C0CB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.82.192.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBO9XPhA065298 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:33:29 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id wBO9XL10097013; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:33:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wBO9WoPq095444; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:33:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201812240933.wBO9WoPq095444@fire.js.berklix.net> To: ctm-users@freebsd.org cc: Stefan Esser , Ed Maste , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD Current , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Warner Losh Subject: Re: ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Aachen Kent User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 22 Dec 2018 05:03:00 +0100." <201812220403.wBM430Oa099167@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:32:50 +0100 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 486D6771C8 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.94)[0.945,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[berklix.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.30)[0.305,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[land.berklix.com,slim.berklix.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.01)[0.006,0]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[203.192.82.46.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:144.76.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.08)[ipnet: 144.76.0.0/16(2.90), asn: 24940(-2.46), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:33:41 -0000 I wrote: > I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/ > & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches: > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/files/ > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/README.JHS > I haven't checked all execution as my ctm_rmail scripts run > automaticaly on an older release, not my current box, but this is > running OK so far: > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07000xEmpty.xz ; > ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz I checked the new ctm was behaving, seems to be except something odd: At about svn-cur.07303 or so (I'm not certain on the exact number, I deleted it from my log, but this is reproducible, I've done it more than once, could again if necessary, it just takes a lot of time) I see a discrepancy using ctm to extract, between ctm built on 9.2-RELEASE & ctm built {from both src or ports} on current. Just the 9.2-RELEASE ctm does not create 3 zero size files: base/db/rep-cache.db-journal doc/db/rep-cache.db-journal ports/db/rep-cache.db-journal All 3 trees contain 15 other zero size files, so presumably the discrepancy is not to do with zero size files as such. All 3 trees have no other files called rep-cache.db-journal I created 3 new trees with ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07300xEmpty.xz on all of { 9.2-RELEASE & ctm built {from src and ports} on current } All 3 trees are the same, with all 3 rep-cache.db-journal Then upgrading to svn-cur 7307 with ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07[0-9][0-9][0-9].xzthe 2 trees on current had identical file lists with all 3 rep-cache.db-journal But again the tree in 9.2-RELEASE no longer included the 3 rep-cache.db-journal Anyone know know if the discrepancy indicates something amiss with ctm ? (rep-cache.db-journal presumably from SVN, maybe older & newer CTMs have some different understanding that data i delivered from SVN ? seems a bit dodgy that, I'd have thought best if CTM had no knowledge what delivered its tree.) --------------- Stefan wrote: > I have converted the diffs into port patches (make makepatch) and > updated the man-page revision dates of ctm.8 and ctm_rmail.8. > > The port update has been committed as r488168. > > I hope this brings the port to the level required to make the CTM > port usable again. Thanks I'll look. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant Sys.Eng. BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent First referendum stole 700,000 votes from Brits in EU; 3,700,000 globaly. Lies criminal funded; jobs pound & markets down. 1.9M new voters 1.3M dead. Email MP: "A new referendum will buy UK & EU more time (Art 50.3), to avoid a hard crash, & consider all options." http://berklix.org/brexit/#mp