From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 21 05:34:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D5816A417 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfing@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2F313C442 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfing@broadpark.no) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-1.04 (built May 9 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JLI00EH9KU6DJC0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:34:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.202.72.184]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-1.04 (built May 9 2007; 32bit)) with SMTP id <0JLI00MTFKU5CP92@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:34:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:34:53 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070721073453.699a5966.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-reply-to: <46A12C87.30408@twe.net> References: <469E8589.8060105@twe.net> <20070718224051.GA17798@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <46A12C87.30408@twe.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH Subject: Re: SCSI error during boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:34:56 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:43:35 +0200 "Uffe R. B. Andersen" wrote: > That's nice to know, though I didn't expect it to be critical, as the > disk has worked well for all 8 years, running with Windows 2000 and > XP. IMHO, you should never use "working on win..." as a statement to say that some hardware is a) working b) compliant with a standard Just my two cents (having seen too much of broken hw and standards on win through the years). -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen