From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 18 0:41:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.36.247]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC5D14D9C for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 00:41:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au) Received: from bragg (bragg [129.127.36.34]) by adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/UofA-1.5) with SMTP id RAA01416; Tue, 18 May 1999 17:11:40 +0930 (CST) Received: from localhost by bragg; (5.65/1.1.8.2/05Aug95-0227PM) id AA18912; Tue, 18 May 1999 17:12:29 +0930 Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 17:12:28 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway X-Sender: kkennawa@bragg To: TAOKA Satoshi Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you need editors/xemacs{,20} (Re: pending/11618: new port: editors/xemacs21) In-Reply-To: <19990518114404B.taoka@infonets.hiroshima-u.ac.jp> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 18 May 1999, TAOKA Satoshi wrote: > Hi, XEmacs users. > > Do you need editors/xemacs{,20} ? > > I think these are deteted and editors/xemacs21 had better be imported > as editors/xemacs. xemacs-21 is still in development, isn't it? I'd prefer to keep the most recent stable version in the tree; anything older can go for all I care. Kris ----- "That suit's sharper than a page of Oscar Wilde witticisms that's been rolled up into a point, sprinkled with lemon juice and jabbed into someone's eye" "Wow, that's sharp!" - Ace Rimmer and the Cat, _Red Dwarf_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message