Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:45:44 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: Yousef Raffah <yraffah@savola.com>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interrupt Storms on irq:11 with Tecra A4 Message-ID: <200608081345.44845.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060809001502.14085B-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060809001502.14085B-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 11:09, Ian Smith wrote: > On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Yousef Raffah wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Sunday 06 August 2006 05:01, Yousef Raffah wrote: > > > > > >> Thank you very much John for your great help and support. Now that I > > >> have the patch working, do I need to remove the entries > > >> hw.pci.link.LNKG.irq=11 > > >> hw.pci.link.LNKH.irq=11 > > >> > > >> from my /boot/loader.conf? > > >> > > > > > > No. The patch lets those entries actually work, so leave them there. :) > > > > > > > > OK > > >> I assume I have to do this every time I buildworld, right? > > >> > > > > > > No, I'll commit the patch and once it is MFC'd you won't have to re-apply it > > > after running cvsup. Until then, you will have to apply it each time after > > > you cvsup. I think you can ignore the 'unretryable' errors from cd0 btw. > > John: does anything much still get MFC'd back to 5-STABLE these days? > Are there any reasons not to go to 6 with old kit that works well with > APM (esp suspend/resume) but not so far with ACPI? (ref: '99 Compaq > Armada 1500c) No. I think 5.x is more dead than 4.x at this point. I think for machines that old ACPI just refuses to attach anyway. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200608081345.44845.jhb>