From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 13:49:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from oneway.com (daedal.oneway.com [205.252.89.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D2A37B67D for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:49:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jay@localhost) by oneway.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA81547; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jay@oneway.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Kuri To: "Forrest W. Christian" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of Union Filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The UNION filesystem is NOT what I was thinking it was.... > > Don't know where the heck I got the idea that the Union Filesystem > permitted a fs to span multiple disks. Probably from the name. =) but yeah... It's the overlapping filesystem type thing I'm interested in. I keep seeing people say 'I use it for xy.' but those warnings are mighty scary. Jay - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNIX: because reboots are for hardware upgrades Jay Kuri jay@oneway.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message