From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 21 15:52:14 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA23546 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 15:52:14 -0700 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA23537 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 15:51:57 -0700 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.11) id QAA13808; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 16:55:45 -0600 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 16:55:45 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199504212255.QAA13808@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" "Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley." (Apr 21, 3:22pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Interim 2.0.X release ( was Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley.) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The next release of FreeBSD gets done in parallel by multiple teams. > Whomever has the best release at the end, as judged by an impartial > panel of BETA testers, gets to be the "official" one. > > I'm not actually joking. If 2-3 teams stepped forward, I'd more than > happily fire the starting gun! *laugh* Jordan's been trying to get other folks to step up to the plate and fixup the entire release mechanism, so he's trying all sorts of ways to get folks to help. If the direct approach doesn't work, let's try the indirect approach and make it a challenge. :-) I hope we find some victims^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteers to do it though.... Nate