From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 08:30:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3011065671 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 08:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127B58FC18 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 08:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4R8U2SO091348 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 08:30:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m4R8U2UE091343; Tue, 27 May 2008 08:30:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:30:02 GMT Message-Id: <200805270830.m4R8U2UE091343@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Marc Olzheim Cc: Subject: Re: bin/3170: vi freaks and dump core if user doesn't exist X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marc Olzheim List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:30:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/3170; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marc Olzheim To: Bill Fenner Cc: Marc Olzheim , bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/3170: vi freaks and dump core if user doesn't exist Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:27:11 +0200 On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:44:27AM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote: > It's easy to fail to reproduce it. Many people have successfully not > reproduced it. Reproducing it requires following the precise steps I > describe, and many people trying to reproduce it skip some steps or > don't do precisely the same thing, resulting in a non-reproduction. > However, since I have reproduced it on 4.0, 5.0, and can still > reproduce it, using the steps I supplied, on 6.2, can we agree that it > still exists in 6.2? Well, the missing information seems to have to do with the terminal. I managed to reproduce it now. The step that's missing in the description, is that this only seems to happen on a virtual terminal on console. At least, I still haven't reproduced it on any other terminal (emulator). Apologies, Mark, for missing the award. ;-) Marc