From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 24 21:02:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AD516A418; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474FD13C48D; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l9OL229P056745; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:02:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9OL1uOO018288; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:01:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l9OL1uqL018287; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:01:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200710242101.l9OL1uqL018287@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU (Ken Smith) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:01:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1193258973.41270.40.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrey Chernov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" , Michal Varga , rafan@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Undefined symbol "__mb_sb_limit" during 7.0-BETA1 installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:02:10 -0000 > > Will it be considered BETA2? Or BETA1 revised? > > I'll name it BETA1.5. > Good deal. > > > Is it possible to find out how the issue happened? > > I had a stupidity leak. > [Info here] > > Sigh. Sorry. Like I said - stupidity leak... > No worries, as they say in Connecticut ... FECES OCCUR! Thanks... Please let me know when your done. The machine I loaded was just a "test" load to see if the machine could go from 4.10 to 7.0, and the machine seems fine with it. One of the disks is bad so I have to order another (One of them there single connector hot swap SCSI that you can't go to Best Buy to get) so I have time to play with re-loads/re-cvsup. Tuc