From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Oct 29 1:22:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6451C37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [193.124.215.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A6843E7B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:22:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from drweb by mail.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.20 #1) id 186SZj-0002Sb-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:22:15 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mail.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 186SYv-00027t-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:21:31 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9T9L0iv059388; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:21:05 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9T9Kvuu059387; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:20:57 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:20:56 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Typo in uid/gid handling in ipfw2 Message-ID: <20021029092056.GA57685@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20021029082617.GA24516@regency.nsu.ru> <20021029003527.A7265@carp.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021029003527.A7265@carp.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Envelope-To: rizzo@icir.org, ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:35:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:26:17PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Currently, both -STABLE and -CURRENT IPFW2 user-level code is broken WRT > > uid/gid handling stuff. > > > > It looks more like a typo, but it is there. I've notified Luigi and > > supplied a fix (attached). I am not sure if it is worth mentioning in > > errata since IPFW2 is not enabled by default (and even hidden). > > > > It's probably worth considering for review and possible commit. > > definitely. if there are any takers... i believe you have tested > the fix is working, right ? sure. even if i didn't want to test it, i could not leave our corporate firewall broken. 8-) plus, the code in question now is the same as in old ipfw. ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message