From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Dec  6 17:57:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA04767
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 6 Dec 1997 17:57:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA04756
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 6 Dec 1997 17:57:32 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from root@implode.root.com)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA29662;
	Sat, 6 Dec 1997 17:58:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712070158.RAA29662@implode.root.com>
To: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: F00F patch problems for 2.2.5-RELEASE (incomplete patch.) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Dec 1997 17:23:36 EST."
             <199712062223.RAA02916@lakes.dignus.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 1997 17:58:48 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> But... the 2.2.5 release of machdep.c doesn't include "opt_cpu.h",
>thus, I586_CPU isn't defined... so the F00F workaround doesn't get
>compiled in... (perhaps somewhere after the 2.2.5-RELEASE cut, this
>include was added?)

   This was fixed yesterday in 2.2-stable by jmg.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project