Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:57:56 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh
Message-ID:  <16323.31748.84583.971494@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20031125151939.GB48007@madman.celabo.org>
References:  <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com> <16322.47726.903593.393976@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.191931.67791612.imp@bsdimp.com> <16322.50980.825349.898362@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031125151939.GB48007@madman.celabo.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Jacques A. Vidrine writes:
 > 
 > So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on with life?

That certainly seems like the best compromise.   Then we can end this
thread ;)

 > That seems to have the most impact.  We can also expend our efforts
 > to improve dynamic linking performance, since that will improve the
 > performance of the other 99.9% of the universe.
 > 

What happened to mdodd's prebinding efforts?

Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16323.31748.84583.971494>