Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:53:35 +0800 From: "Howard Su" <howard0su@gmail.com> To: "gnn@freebsd.org" <gnn@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modularize kernel Message-ID: <f126fae00609071953j445465d0w2d65b4c72a23e920@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <m27j0gqc7s.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> References: <f126fae00609060912j4a8ec0c1sa12f59aa453e4cd9@mail.gmail.com> <f126fae00609062247n62aaf3d7tac8f3980eeb148fb@mail.gmail.com> <m27j0gqc7s.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/7/06, gnn@freebsd.org <gnn@freebsd.org> wrote: > At Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:47:46 +0800, > Hello Howard, > > The monolithic vs. modularized kernel is an old discussion. If you're > really interested in pursuing this you'll have a lot of work to do, > mostly in figuring out explicitly all the implicit inter-module > dependencies. Fascinating and fun, but you likely need a good reason > to do it. I listed the advantages I can think about. Can they convince you? -- -Howard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f126fae00609071953j445465d0w2d65b4c72a23e920>